Skip to content

Use consistent naming for Solid-OIDC - #154

Merged
acoburn merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
consistent-naming
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Use consistent naming for Solid-OIDC#154
acoburn merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
consistent-naming

Conversation

@acoburn

@acoburn acoburn commented Apr 19, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Resolves #104

The spec mostly uses Solid-OIDC, so I took that to be canonical (which is also my understanding).

@acoburn
acoburn requested a review from elf-pavlik April 19, 2022 12:35
@acoburn
acoburn merged commit 024339c into main Apr 25, 2022
@acoburn
acoburn deleted the consistent-naming branch April 25, 2022 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consistent naming of "Solid OIDC" or "Solid-OIDC" in the specification and the primer

2 participants